As mentioned above, the three synoptic gospel accounts contain parallels. The similarity between these parallels is so great that scholars believe the gospel accounts used the same sources or are based on one another.
There are many theories about how Matthew, Mark, and Luke are related to one another. There is not complete agreement on which theory is correct. Examples of theories include:
- Oral Tradition Theories: The Gospel was transmitted through oral tradition and eventually written down. These theories are no longer prevalent because the texts are too similar to have been transmitted orally.
- Interdependent Theories: Later gospel accounts are based on the text of one or more earlier accounts. These theories are widely held today.
- Proto-Gospel Theories: The gospels are based on original written source that no longer exists, such as an Aramaic gospel account or a collection of the sayings of Jesus.
- Fragmentary Theories: The gospels were composed of fragments from a variety of different sources such as collections of miracle stories, parables, and reports of the crucifixion.
A prevalent theory today is that Matthew and Luke each had a copy of Mark, which was written earlier. This is a variation of the “Interdependent theories.”
To continue the lesson, go to the next page to read about Mark.